← Back to browse

Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Multiple Representations in Equation-Solving Problems - An Eye Tracking Study

Stage 1 article

AuthorsSarah MaloneKristin AltmeyerMarkus VogelRoland Brünken
Year2018
Item typeJournal Article

Multiple external representations (MERs) play an important role in the learning field of mathematics. Whereas the CTML and the ITPC model assume that the heterogeneous combination of symbolic and analogous representations fosters learning, the Design, Functions and Tasks framework implicates that learning benefits depend on the specific functions of MERs. The current paper will be a conceptual replication study of one of the few studies comparing single representations, heterogeneous and homogeneous MERs in the context of mathematics learning. In a balanced incomplete block design, the participants will be provided single representations (graphic, text, or formula) or a heterogeneous (e.g., text + graphic) or homogeneous (text + formula) combination of these to solve linear system of equations problems. Gaze behavior, task performance, and time on task will be recorded. On the basis of previous research, learning with MERs is expected to be superior to learning with single representations. Moreover, heterogeneous representations are expected to be superior to homogeneous ones. The relationship between MERs and performance is assumed to be (serially) mediated by cognitive load and number of transitions. Additionally, text is expected to be fixated more often and longer than formula or graphic.

Tags

OSFStage 1 Manuscript

Other

AuthorsSarah MaloneKristin AltmeyerMarkus VogelRoland Brünken
Year2020
VenueJournal of Computer Assisted Learning
Item typeJournal Article

Multiple external representations (MERs) play an important role in the learning field of mathematics. Whereas the cognitive theory of multimedia learning and the integrative text and picture comprehension model assume that the heterogeneous combination of symbolic and analogous representations fosters learning; the design, functions, and tasks framework holds that learning benefits depend on the specific functions of MERs. The current paper describes a conceptual replication study of one of the few studies comparing single representations, heterogeneous, and homogeneous MERs in the context of mathematics learning. In a balanced incomplete block design, the participants were provided single representations (a graphic, text, or formula) or a heterogeneous (e.g., text + graphic) or homogeneous (text + formula) combination of these to solve linear system of equations problems. In accordance with previous research, performance was superior in conditions providing MERs compared to single-representation conditions. Moreover, heterogeneous MERs led to time savings over homogeneous MERs which triggered an increase in cognitive load. Contrary to previous research, text was the least fixated representation whereas the graphical representation proved to be most beneficial. With regard to practical implications, experts should be fostered through more challenging homogeneous MERs whereas novices should be supported through the accessible graphic contained in heterogeneous MERs.

Tags

Stage 1 LinkedStage 2 ManuscriptWiley